Agroforestry & tree crops
The century-long argument that on sloping ground the crop should be a tree, and the working farms and forest gardens that have been testing it.
Notes
The case was made in full in 1929 and has been re-made every generation since: annual tillage on hill land loses the hill, and a tree crop yielding a comparable staple does not.
What has changed is the evidence. J. Russell Smith could point at old chestnut and carob economies; the people who followed him planted the systems themselves and measured them. A two-acre forest garden at Dartington has thirty years of records behind it. A hundred and six acres in Wisconsin has been converted from row-crop corn and sells commercially from the result. A tenth of an acre in Holyoke carries more than two hundred edible species.
Those are different scales answering the same question, which is the useful thing about them.